There is also the UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX), a small
aggressive fund consisting of Growth Large Cap stocks, which experienced a nearly 60%
drawdown.
And there's the Fidelity Series Growth Company (FCGSX), also in the Growth Large Cap
category.
If we look at the global funds that outperformed during this five-year period, they are
mostly leveraged ETFs, which come with triple the risk.
And that's it!
Furthermore, the list of outperforming funds changes with each research cycle. It's
unfortunate that the data is only available for a five-year period and cannot be extracted
for arbitrary durations, such as seven years.
Charles Schwab provides data for a 10-year period across 1,636 Large Cap funds. Over
that interval, with our current performance, only those same two Baron Partners funds
(with 42% Tesla holdings) outperformed us.
Conclusions:
There are simply no public funds that demonstrate comparable results to our Portfolio
while being built on fundamental ideas and composed of companies with high-quality
businesses. And that astonishes me.
With tens of thousands of funds and thousands of professional managers, boasting
various credentials like CFA, MBA, PhDs, Harvard, and Stanford alumni, they have not
achieved the same outcome as our approach, which started as an experiment seven years
ago. In that experiment, everything - the history, the core idea, and most importantly, the
portfolio composition - was published openly. It all happened right in front of the eyes of
over 5,000 of my readers. I shared my portfolios and many of my real-time purchases.
Over a hundred investors replicated the Portfolio, some on their own and others with my
assistance.